[PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/rds: own the fastpath locks across connection teardown · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-16
[PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net/rds: use wq_has_sleeper() in release_in_xmit() · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-16
[PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net/rds: clear cp_flags bits individually in rds_conn_path_reset() · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-16
[PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net/rds: tcp: don't force RDS_CONN_RESETTING over a concurrent shutdown · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-16
[PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net/rds: acquire RDS_IN_XMIT in rds_tcp_reset_callbacks() · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-16
[PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net/rds: acquire the fastpath locks in rds_conn_shutdown() · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-16
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/rds: own the fastpath locks across connection teardown · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2026-08-20
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/rds: own the fastpath locks across connection teardown · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-21
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/rds: own the fastpath locks across connection teardown · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2026-08-22
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/rds: own the fastpath locks across connection teardown · Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org> · 2026-08-22

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/rds: own the fastpath locks across connection teardown

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-08-22 00:03:48
Also in: linux-rdma

On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 22:07:26 -0700 Allison Henderson wrote:

The other commentary nits from the review do have merit though. If you
like, I can send a v3 with those corrected, but I think the code itself
is ok. The patch 1 comment about cong.c is a pre-existing issue similar
to the lost-wakeup issue that patch 1 fixes. So I can send a follow-up
converting those waitqueue_active() calls to wq_has_sleeper().

I hope that helps? Thank you for being accommodating with the branch
targeting.

Thanks, yes! IIUC you don't mind sending a v3 so let's go with that
option.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help