Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] netconsole: add an address family to struct inet_addr
From: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-07 11:21:45
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 4:49 PM Breno Leitao [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 10:33:01PM +0100, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote:quoted
@@ -731,7 +733,7 @@ static void netconsole_print_banner(struct netconsole_target *nt) /* Parse the string and populate the `inet_addr` union. Return 0 if IPv4 is^-> there is no more union. I think there are other references for union that needs to be updated as well.
I fixed this in the next patch, but let me do it here for consistency. I didn't find any other reference to union.
quoted
+static int netpoll_parse_ip_addr(const char *str, struct inet_addr *addr)...quoted
return -1;Should the failure path set addr->family = AF_UNSPEC?
The failure path leaves addr untouched, so if the user writes an invalid value to local_ip or remote_ip the write fails and the original value is maintained.
quoted
+++ b/include/linux/netpoll.h +struct inet_addr { + /* Address family: AF_UNSPEC when unset, else AF_INET or AF_INET6 */ + u8 family; + union { + __be32 ip; + struct in6_addr in6; + }; };Since a1116396476f6 ("netconsole: move local_ip/remote_ip/ipv6 to netconsole_target") struct netpoll has no address member, and netconsole is the only user left in the tree: drivers/net/netconsole.c: union inet_addr local_ip, remote_ip; drivers/net/netconsole.c:static int netpoll_parse_ip_addr(const char *str, union inet_addr *addr) Since you touched it, can you move it to netconsole headers, please?
Sure, will do it in v2.