Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] netconsole: use the address family instead of the ipv6 flag
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Date: 2026-08-06 15:56:02
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 10:33:02PM +0100, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Now that we have the address family in inet_addr, use that and remove nt->ipv6. We no longer need netcons_local_ip_unset() to check that all bytes are zeroes, as that is now denoted by (family == AF_UNSPEC). Signed-off-by: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <redacted> --- drivers/net/netconsole.c | 82 ++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c index d615a9256787..070bae7b4fd7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c@@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ enum target_state { * local_mac (read-only) * @local_ip: Source IP address of the target (read-write). * @remote_ip: Destination IP address of the target (read-write). - * @ipv6: Whether the target addresses are IPv6 (read-write). * @local_port: Source UDP port of the target (read-write). * @remote_port: Destination UDP port of the target (read-write). * @remote_mac: Destination ethernet address of the target (read-write).@@ -213,7 +212,6 @@ struct netconsole_target { bool release; struct netpoll np; struct inet_addr local_ip, remote_ip; - bool ipv6; u16 local_port, remote_port; u8 remote_mac[ETH_ALEN]; /* protected by target_list_lock; +1 gives scnprintf() room for its@@ -463,23 +461,6 @@ static int netcons_take_ipv4(struct netconsole_target *nt, return 0; } -/* - * Test whether the caller left nt->local_ip unset, so that - * netcons_netpoll_setup() should auto-populate it from the egress device. - * - * nt->local_ip is a union of __be32 (IPv4) and struct in6_addr (IPv6), - * so an IPv6 address whose first 4 bytes are zero (e.g. ::1, ::2, - * IPv4-mapped ::ffff:a.b.c.d) must not be tested via the IPv4 arm — - * doing so would misclassify a caller-supplied address as unset and - * silently overwrite it with whatever address the device exposes. - */ -static bool netcons_local_ip_unset(const struct netconsole_target *nt) -{ - if (nt->ipv6) - return ipv6_addr_any(&nt->local_ip.in6); - return !nt->local_ip.ip; -} - static int netcons_netpoll_setup(struct netconsole_target *nt) { struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;@@ -525,16 +506,13 @@ static int netcons_netpoll_setup(struct netconsole_target *nt) rtnl_lock(); } - if (netcons_local_ip_unset(nt)) { - if (!nt->ipv6) { - err = netcons_take_ipv4(nt, ndev); - if (err) - goto put; - } else { + if (nt->local_ip.family == AF_UNSPEC) { + if (nt->remote_ip.family == AF_INET6) err = netcons_take_ipv6(nt, ndev); - if (err) - goto put; - } + else + err = netcons_take_ipv4(nt, ndev); + if (err) + goto put;
nice, that is much clearer.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
ip_overwritten = true; }@@ -716,22 +694,22 @@ static void netconsole_print_banner(struct netconsole_target *nt) struct netpoll *np = &nt->np; np_info(np, "local port %d\n", nt->local_port); - if (nt->ipv6) + if (nt->local_ip.family == AF_INET6) np_info(np, "local IPv6 address %pI6c\n", &nt->local_ip.in6); else np_info(np, "local IPv4 address %pI4\n", &nt->local_ip.ip);
Any chance it can be UNSPEC?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
np_info(np, "interface name '%s'\n", np->dev_name); np_info(np, "local ethernet address '%pM'\n", np->dev_mac); np_info(np, "remote port %d\n", nt->remote_port); - if (nt->ipv6) + if (nt->remote_ip.family == AF_INET6) np_info(np, "remote IPv6 address %pI6c\n", &nt->remote_ip.in6); else
Same question
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -755,7 +733,7 @@ static int netpoll_parse_ip_addr(const char *str, struct inet_addr *addr) in6_pton(str, len, (void *)&addr->in6, -1, &end) > 0 && (!end || *end == 0 || *end == '\n')) { addr->family = AF_INET6;
Why not setting family for for IPV4? In
if (in4_pton(str, len, (void *)addr, -1, &end) > 0 &&
(!end || *end == 0 || *end == '\n'))
return 0;