Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Add SoC-e switch IP and DSA bindings
From: Vasilij Strassheim <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-05 12:40:56
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Mon, 2026-08-03 at 18:43 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ compatible: + const: soce,switch-dsaWay too generic. I understand that SoCe will NEVER - and you certify that - develop a second, different "switch-dsa" model and they call this one like this?It is intentionally generic to cover the common basics of all variants and configurations of the synthesized switch in DSA. I'm not sure what kind of guarantee I'm supposed to provide here regarding SoCe. If switch-dsa is already mainline in the future, then a different compatible will be needed for incompatible new models.If it is not compatible, it needs a different compatible. It gets interesting with something you synthesizer, something where there are a number of different synthesise options. How do you define compatible? You might want a very specific compatible, for your synthesise configuration, and a more generic compatible which might work for other synthesise configurations, but maybe not?
Yes, that's not really satisfying. I will tweak the driver so that it reads as much as possible from registers. Currently, I'm considering adopting SoC-e IP Core families as the compatible option. In my case, that would mean soce,mrs. Or if still too generic something like mrs-switch-v1.0 or mrs-basic. However, I won't be able to submit a v2 in the next few weeks. Maybe I (or someone else) will come up with something better by then.
Andrew
Thanks Vasilij