Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2026-06-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: phy: realtek: add support for RTL8261C_CG

From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Date: 2026-06-10 16:32:46
Also in: lkml

Hi,

On 6/9/26 04:07, javen wrote:
From: Javen Xu <redacted>

This patch adds support for Realtek phy chip RTL8261C_CG. Its PHY ID is
0x001cc898.

Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <redacted>
[...]
+static int rtl8261x_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
+{
+	bool changed = false;
+	u16 adv_1g = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_DISABLE)
+		return genphy_c45_pma_setup_forced(phydev);
This condition above is already done when calling genphy_c45_config_aneg,
is it really necessary to put it there ?
+
+	ret = genphy_c45_an_setup_master_slave(phydev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+	if (ret > 0)
+		changed = true;
I'm wondering if this call to genphy_c45_an_setup_master_slave() may actually
be integrated directly into genphy_c45_config_aneg(), as we do for C22.

It _may_ break some C45 phys that would rely on default values though, but this
should be more correct ?

Maxime
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help