Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: sfp: Describe and handle regulators
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2026-03-03 15:10:36
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2026-03-03 15:10:36
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Romain Gantois wrote:
Hi everyone, This series describes regulators supplying the VccT and VccR pins of an SFP cage or soldered-down transceiver. These regulators can then be turned on only when the SFP device is probed, thus saving power on systems which only load SFP cage support at certain times, or load SFP device descriptions via device tree overlays. Please let me know what you think.
As ever, I don't want to be adding support for stuff into mainline which doesn't ever get used - historically, we've had a lot of that. So, any patch set which adds some kind of facility like this needs to be accompanied by a user of it. This is especially true in this case, because I want to see why you're wanting to have two regulators, when INF-8074 suggests that both VccT and VccR should be derived from the same supply. The reason the modules have separate supplies for the transmitter and receiver is because the host side has the supply filtering networks to ensure cross-talk between each is kept to a minimum. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!