On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 02:49:19AM +0800, Max Hsu wrote:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 09:23:18 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:

quoted

So do the general rules for devicetree bindings, that's not something
SiFive specific FWIW.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Thanks for the review and the ack, Conor.

I'll update the commit message in v2 to reference the general device
tree conventions.

It's fine as-is, was just pointing out that this is a general guideline.
The SiFive document is mostly about the naming of the fallback
compatibles etc that represent the IP core, rather than the soc-specific
part.