On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 09:23:18 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:

So do the general rules for devicetree bindings, that's not something
SiFive specific FWIW.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Thanks for the review and the ack, Conor.

I'll update the commit message in v2 to reference the general device
tree conventions.

Thanks,
Max Hsu

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 5:23 PM Conor Dooley [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 04:27:06PM +0800, Max Hsu wrote:

quoted

Add the SiFive FU740-C000 PLIC compatible string to the binding
documentation.

This follows the SiFive IP versioning scheme which requires SoC-specific
compatible strings for proper hardware identification, even when the IP
blocks are functionally identical.

So do the general rules for devicetree bindings, that's not something
SiFive specific FWIW.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

quoted

Signed-off-by: Max Hsu <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml      | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
index e0267223887e..351d26ab1956 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml

@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ properties:
               - eswin,eic7700-plic
               - microchip,pic64gx-plic
               - sifive,fu540-c000-plic
+              - sifive,fu740-c000-plic
               - spacemit,k1-plic
               - starfive,jh7100-plic
               - starfive,jh7110-plic

--

2.43.0