Re: [PATCH net-next v1] icmp: fix ip_rt_bug race in icmp_route_lookup reverse path
From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-02-03 16:24:15
Also in:
lkml
On 2/3/26 3:41 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On 1/28/26 10:05 AM, Jiayuan Chen wrote:quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c index 19c9c838967f..dc9dcc799824 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c@@ -559,6 +559,23 @@ static struct rtable *icmp_route_lookup(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *fl4, /* steal dst entry from skb_in, don't drop refcnt */ skb_dstref_steal(skb_in); skb_dstref_restore(skb_in, orefdst); + + /* + * At this point, fl4_dec.daddr should NOT be local (we + * checked fl4_dec.saddr above). However, a race condition + * may occur if the address is added to the interface + * concurrently. In that case, ip_route_input() returns a + * LOCAL route with dst.output=ip_rt_bug, which must not + * be used for output. + */ + if (!err && rt2 && rt2->rt_type == RTN_LOCAL) { + net_warn_ratelimited("%s: detected local route for %pI4 " + "during ICMP error handling (src %pI4), " + "possible address race\n", + __func__, &fl4_dec.daddr, &fl4_dec.saddr);The fix looks correct to me, but this patch should target the 'net' tree and the above warning message is a bit off: the text string should not be broken to fit the 80 chars limit - it need to be greepable - it's probably better to not include the function name. /P
Does the message even provide value? There is nothing a user can do about it.