On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:29:40 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:

Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2/6/26 4:30 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:  

quoted

@@ -515,6 +553,12 @@ static int __nft_rbtree_insert(const struct net *net, const struct nft_set *set,
 	    nft_rbtree_interval_end(rbe_ge) && nft_rbtree_interval_end(new))
 		return -ENOTEMPTY;
 
+	/* - start element overlaps an open interval but end element is new:
+	 *   partial overlap, reported as -ENOEMPTY.  

AI noticed a typo above, should be: -ENOTEMPTY.

Given the timeline, a repost will land into the next cycle. I guess it's
better to merge this as-is and eventually follow-up later.  

Thanks.  Comments are for humans not machines so I think its fine.

That said, I will try to set up some form of AI code review here for
future MRs.

FWIW if you have a patchwork where patches are queued and a tree on
kernel.org against which you test -- I can hook up our AI bot to your
patchwork instance.