RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests/net: Add packetdrill packetdrill cases
From: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <hidden>
Date: 2026-01-14 16:13:00
Also in:
bpf, linux-doc, linux-kselftest
-----Original Message----- From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 3:18 PM To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <redacted>; Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Cc: pabeni@redhat.com; edumazet@google.com; parav@nvidia.com; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; corbet@lwn.net; horms@kernel.org; dsahern@kernel.org; kuniyu@google.com; bpf@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; dave.taht@gmail.com; jhs@mojatatu.com; kuba@kernel.org; stephen@networkplumber.org; xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com; jiri@resnulli.us; davem@davemloft.net; andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; donald.hunter@gmail.com; ast@fiberby.net; liuhangbin@gmail.com; shuah@kernel.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; ij@kernel.org; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) <redacted>; g.white@cablelabs.com; ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com; mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com; cheshire <redacted>; rs.ietf@gmx.at; Jason_Livingood@comcast.com; Vidhi Goel <redacted>; Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests/net: Add packetdrill packetdrill cases [You don't often get email from willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 11:47 PM To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <redacted> Cc: pabeni@redhat.com; edumazet@google.com; parav@nvidia.com; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; corbet@lwn.net; horms@kernel.org; dsahern@kernel.org; kuniyu@google.com; bpf@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; dave.taht@gmail.com; jhs@mojatatu.com; kuba@kernel.org; stephen@networkplumber.org; xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com; jiri@resnulli.us; davem@davemloft.net; andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; donald.hunter@gmail.com; ast@fiberby.net; liuhangbin@gmail.com; shuah@kernel.org; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; ij@kernel.org; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) [off-list ref]; g.white@cablelabs.com; ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com; mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com; cheshire [off-list ref]; rs.ietf@gmx.at; Jason_Livingood@comcast.com; Vidhi Goel [off-list ref]; Willem de Bruijn [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests/net: Add packetdrill packetdrill cases CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:58 AM [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Chia-Yu Chang <redacted> Linux Accurate ECN test sets using ACE counters and AccECN options to cover several scenarios: Connection teardown, different ACK conditions, counter wrapping, SACK space grabbing, fallback schemes, negotiation retransmission/reorder/loss, AccECN option drop/loss, different handshake reflectors, data with marking, and different sysctl values. Co-developed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> ---Chia-Yu, thank you for posting the packetdrill tests. A couple thoughts: (1) These tests are using the experimental AccECN packetdrill support that is not in mainline packetdrill yet. Can you please share the github URL for the version of packetdrill you used? I will work on merging the appropriate experimental AccECN packetdrill support into the Google packetdrill mainline branch. (2) The last I heard, the tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ infrastructure does not run tests in subdirectories of that packetdrill/ directory, and that is why all the tests in tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ are in a single directory. When you run these tests, do all the tests actually get run? Just wanted to check this. :-) Thanks! nealHi Neal, Regards (2), I will put all ACCECN cases in the tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ But I would like to include another script to avoid running these AccECN tests one-by-one manually, does it make sense to you? Thanks.All scripts under tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill are already picked up for automated testing in kselftests: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=8a405552fd3b
OK, I was using ksft_runner.sh to run all 58 AccECN case one-by-one. But since run_kselftest.sh can accept multiple "-t" arguments, so I will not commit another script with similar functionlaities but just rename all AccECN case with tcp_accecn in the prefix. Thanks. Chia-Yu