On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 10:46:38 +0200 Heikki Krogerus wrote:

quoted

quoted

+1 I don't wanna speak for Jeremy and Matt but with their Ack, and
assuming there's no dependency in net-next I think i2c tree may
be the easiest path?  

Yes, given this is more i2c- than net-related, I would be fine for the
changes to go via the i2c tree there. Staging the core via i2c and then
(subsequently) this one via net would also work, but seems to be
overkill for a minor change to the net driver.  

OK. I'll drop this one from v3 and send it separately later as a
follow-up, once we have the i2c side ready.

FWIW my reading of Jeremy's reply was that we're okay with these
patches going via i2c, so:

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

and no need to drop this from the series.