Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:18:42AM +1100, Jeremy Kerr kirjoitti:

Hi Heikki and Jakub,

quoted

+1 I don't wanna speak for Jeremy and Matt but with their Ack, and
assuming there's no dependency in net-next I think i2c tree may
be the easiest path?

Yes, given this is more i2c- than net-related, I would be fine for the
changes to go via the i2c tree there. Staging the core via i2c and then
(subsequently) this one via net would also work, but seems to be
overkill for a minor change to the net driver.

OK. I'll drop this one from v3 and send it separately later as a
follow-up, once we have the i2c side ready.

I have some overall comments on the i2c side though, I'll follow up with
those separately.

thanks,

-- 
heikki