Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2026-01-19

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: net: improve error handling in passive TFO test

From: Yohei Kojima <hidden>
Date: 2026-01-15 16:21:07
Also in: kernel-janitors, linux-kselftest, lkml

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
quoted
Improve the error handling in passive TFO test to check the return value
from sendto(), and to fail if read() or fprintf() failed.
You propose to adjust error detection and corresponding exception handling another bit.
How do you think about to take also another look if further function implementations
would be similarly affected?
Thank you for the suggestion. The first objective of this series is to
fix the misleading behavior that was caused by the following bug.
Therefore, I intentionally limited the scope of this patch to the
affected or closely related functions.

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/602c9e1ba5bb2ee1997bb38b1d866c9c3b807ae9.1767624906.git.yk@y-koj.net/ (local)

I believe this is sufficient to prevent it from showing misleading error
messages when the test fails.

Thank you,
Yohei
Regards,
Markus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help