On 1/30/2026 6:36 PM, Bhargava Chenna Marreddy wrote:

quoted

On 1/30/2026 2:05 PM, Vikas Gupta wrote:

quoted

quoted

   drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_devlink.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_devlink.c
index a987afebd64d..57db3caabcfb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnge/bnge_devlink.c

@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int bnge_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
                                DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_FW, buf);
          if (rc) {
                  NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
-                                  "Failed to set roce firmware version");
+                                  "Failed to set generic firmware version");

Thanks for fixing. I believe instead of generic, "Failed to set
firmware version"  is enough.

ACK. will send v2.

Should this be a candidate for net with a Fixes tag?

I am open to either approach. It does not break functionality, but the 
current message can be misleading so I am happy to tag it for net if you 
think it’s appropriate.

Thanks,
Bhargava Marreddy

Thanks,
Alok