Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2025-10-27

Re: [PATCH net-next v01 1/9] hinic3: Add PF framework

From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-10-27 10:00:40
Also in: linux-doc, lkml

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 03:15:27PM +0800, Fan Gong wrote:
Add support for PF framework based on the VF code.

Co-developed-by: Zhu Yikai <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yikai <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Fan Gong <gongfan1@huawei.com>
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_nic_cfg.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_nic_cfg.c
index 979f47ca77f9..2b93026845ff 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_nic_cfg.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_nic_cfg.c
@@ -117,17 +117,49 @@ int hinic3_set_port_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, u16 new_mtu)
 					 &func_tbl_cfg);
 }
 
+#define PF_SET_VF_MAC(hwdev, status) \
+	(HINIC3_IS_VF(hwdev) && (status) == HINIC3_PF_SET_VF_ALREADY)
+
nit: I think the above could be a function rather than a macro.

...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -157,9 +189,9 @@ int hinic3_set_mac(struct hinic3_hwdev *hwdev, const u8 *mac_addr, u16 vlan_id,
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
-	if (mac_info.msg_head.status == MGMT_STATUS_PF_SET_VF_ALREADY) {
+	if (PF_SET_VF_MAC(hwdev, mac_info.msg_head.status)) {
 		dev_warn(hwdev->dev, "PF has already set VF mac, Ignore set operation\n");
-		return 0;
+		return HINIC3_PF_SET_VF_ALREADY;
It seems to me that this custom return value can be propagated up
and returned by the probe function. If so, this doesn't seem desirable.
And, overall, I would recommend against the custom calling convention
that custom return values imply.
 	}
 
 	if (mac_info.msg_head.status == MGMT_STATUS_EXIST) {
...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help