Re: update kernel-doc for MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap())
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
Date: 2025-10-09 01:07:21
Also in:
dri-devel, intel-gfx, io-uring, kvm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-ide, linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-scsi, lkml, virtualization
Hello: This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) by Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) [off-list ref]: On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 19:58:10 +0300 you wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 06:23:48PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:quoted
I don't quite understand the interaction with PG_Reserved and why anybody using this function should care. So maybe you can rephrase in a way that is easier to digest, and rather focuses on what callers of this function are supposed to do vs. have the liberty of not doing?[...]
Here is the summary with links:
- update kernel-doc for MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap())
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/b3dcc9d1d806
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html