Re: [PATCH] nvme/tcp: handle tls partially sent records in write_space()
From: Wilfred Mallawa <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-08 02:12:00
Also in:
linux-nvme, lkml
On Tue, 2025-10-07 at 11:51 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/7/25 11:24, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2025-10-07 at 07:19 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:quoted
On 10/7/25 02:46, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:quoted
From: Wilfred Mallawa <redacted>[...]quoted
I wonder: Do we really need to check for a partially assembled record, or wouldn't it be easier to call queue->write_space() every time here? We sure would end up with executing the callback more often, but if no data is present it shouldn't do any harm. IE just use if (nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue) queue->write_space(sk);Hey Hannes, This was my initial approach, but I figured using tls_is_partially_sent_record() might be slightly more efficient. But if we think that's negligible, happy to go with this approach (omitting the partial record check).Please do. Performance testing on NVMe-TCP is notoriously tricky, so for now we really should not assume anything here. And it's making the patch _vastly_ simpler, _and_ we don't have to involve the networking folks here.
Okay, will send a V2 with this approach.
We have a similar patch for the data_ready() function in nvmet_tcp(), and that seemed to work, too. Nit: we don't unset the 'NOSPACE' flag there. Can you check if that's really required? And, if it is, fixup nvmet_tcp() to unset it? Or, if not, modify your patch to not clear it?
I don't see why we would need to clear the NOSPACE flag in data_ready()? My understanding is that this flag is used when the send buffer is full. I would think the clear_bit() is necessary in write_space() since it would typically get done in something like sk_stream_write_space()? However, running some quick FIOs with the clear_bit() removed, things seem to work. Not sure if removing it has any further implications though... Regards, Wilfred
Cheers, Hannes