[syzbot ci] Re: net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.
From: syzbot ci <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-12 07:46:48
Also in:
cgroups, linux-mm, mptcp, syzbot
syzbot ci has tested the following series [v2] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811173116.2829786-1-kuniyu@google.com (local) * [PATCH v2 net-next 01/12] mptcp: Fix up subflow's memcg when CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA=n. * [PATCH v2 net-next 02/12] mptcp: Use tcp_under_memory_pressure() in mptcp_epollin_ready(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 03/12] tcp: Simplify error path in inet_csk_accept(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 04/12] net: Call trace_sock_exceed_buf_limit() for memcg failure with SK_MEM_RECV. * [PATCH v2 net-next 05/12] net: Clean up __sk_mem_raise_allocated(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 06/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_from_sk(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 07/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_sk_enabled(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_(un)?charge(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 09/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_under_memory_pressure(). * [PATCH v2 net-next 10/12] net: Define sk_memcg under CONFIG_MEMCG. * [PATCH v2 net-next 11/12] net-memcg: Store MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED in sk->sk_memcg. * [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting. and found the following issue: kernel build error Full report is available here: https://ci.syzbot.org/series/6fc666d9-cfec-413c-a98c-75c91ad6c07d *** kernel build error tree: net-next URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git base: 37816488247ddddbc3de113c78c83572274b1e2e arch: amd64 compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.7 (++20250616065708+6146a88f6049-1~exp1~20250616065826.132), Debian LLD 20.1.7 config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/a5d5d856-2809-4eee-87ca-2cd1630214ae/config net/tls/tls_device.c:374:8: error: call to undeclared function 'sk_should_enter_memory_pressure'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] *** If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message: Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.