Thread (140 messages) 140 messages, 13 authors, 2025-09-01

Re: [PATCH v1 13/36] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()

From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-28 07:44:34
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, io-uring, kvm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-ide, linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-scsi, lkml, virtualization

On 28.08.25 09:21, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:17AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
quoted
We can now safely iterate over all pages in a folio, so no need for the
pfn_to_page().

Also, as we already force the refcount in __init_single_page() to 1,
we can just set the refcount to 0 and avoid page_ref_freeze() +
VM_BUG_ON. Likely, in the future, we would just want to tell
__init_single_page() to which value to initialize the refcount.

Further, adjust the comments to highlight that we are dealing with an
open-coded prep_compound_page() variant, and add another comment explaining
why we really need the __init_single_page() only on the tail pages.

Note that the current code was likely problematic, but we never ran into
it: prep_compound_tail() would have been called with an offset that might
exceed a memory section, and prep_compound_tail() would have simply
added that offset to the page pointer -- which would not have done the
right thing on sparsemem without vmemmap.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
---
  mm/hugetlb.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 4a97e4f14c0dc..1f42186a85ea4 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3237,17 +3237,18 @@ static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
  {
  	enum zone_type zone = zone_idx(folio_zone(folio));
  	int nid = folio_nid(folio);
+	struct page *page = folio_page(folio, start_page_number);
  	unsigned long head_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
  	unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = head_pfn + end_page_number;
-	int ret;
-
-	for (pfn = head_pfn + start_page_number; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
-		struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
  
+	/*
+	 * We mark all tail pages with memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(),
+	 * so these pages are completely uninitialized.
                              ^ not? ;-)
Can you elaborate?

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help