Thread (140 messages) 140 messages, 13 authors, 2025-09-01

Re: [PATCH v1 11/36] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs

From: Wei Yang <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-28 07:37:58
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, io-uring, kvm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-ide, linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-scsi, lkml, virtualization

On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:15AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where
the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section.

Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh.

Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB
(HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB
(SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded.

As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size
in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory
sections on these problematic kernel configs.

nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound
page / folio.

Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <redacted>

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help