On Wed, Aug 27, 2025, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2025-08-27 12:41:04 [-0700], Sean Christopherson wrote:
quoted
Michael,
Sean,
would the bellow work by chance? It is a quick shot but it looks
symmetrical…
Gah, sorry, I flagged your earlier mail and then forgot to circle back to it
(for whatever reason, I didn't entirely grok what you were suggesting).
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/kernel/vhost_task.c b/kernel/vhost_task.c
index bc738fa90c1d6..27107dcc1cbfe 100644
--- a/kernel/vhost_task.c
+++ b/kernel/vhost_task.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ void vhost_task_stop(struct vhost_task *vtsk)
* freeing it below.
*/
wait_for_completion(&vtsk->exited);
+ put_task_struct(vtsk->task);
kfree(vtsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_task_stop);
@@ -148,7 +149,7 @@ struct vhost_task *vhost_task_create(bool (*fn)(void *),
return ERR_CAST(tsk);
}
- vtsk->task = tsk;
+ vtsk->task = get_task_struct(tsk);
return vtsk;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_task_create);
Nice! This fixes things too. Either solution works for me. Or maybe do both?
Attempting to wake a task that vhost_task knows has exited (is exiting?) is a
bit gross, but even with that hardening, guarding against UAF is very nice to
have too.
Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>