Thread (58 messages) 58 messages, 4 authors, 2025-08-25

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/23][pull request] Queue configs and large buffer providers

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-08-21 01:26:34
Also in: io-uring, lkml

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 06:59:51 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote:
We could make sure anything touching io_uring/zcrx. and anything using
netmem_ref/net_iov goes to netdev. I think roughly adding something
like this to general networking entry?

F: io_uring/zcrx.*
K: \bnet(mem_ref|_iov)\b
Right, I think clearest would be to add a new entry for this, and copy
the real metadata (Jens as the maintainer, his tree etc.). If we just
add the match to netdev it will look like the patches will flow via
net-next. No strong preference, tho. As long as get_maintainer suggests
CCing netdev I'll be happy.
I had suggested this before but never had time to suggest the actual
changes, and in the back of my mind was a bit weary of spamming the
maintainers, but it seems this is not as much a concern as the patches
not getting to netdev.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help