On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 08:41:49PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
This smells of an LLM generated patch.
Maybe, maybe not.
So i think you are somewhat
wasting your time explaining in detail why this is wrong. Well, maybe
in a few generations of LLM it might learn from what you said, but
that does not address the immediate problem.
You do realize that there _are_ humans out there, right? Ones capable of
learning, that is...
We need developers using LLM to accept they have often wrong, and you
need to spend time and effort:
1) Proving it got is wrong.
2) That after a lot of effort, failing to prove it wrong, accept it might be right.
3) Proving it actually got it right.
It took me about 60 seconds to prove the POLLERR change was wrong, and
i know nothing about this code base. So it is in fact not a lot of
effort.