On 30/07/2025 12:56, Laura Nao wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
clk_mux->regmap = regmap;
+ clk_mux->regmap_hwv = regmap_hwv;
clk_mux->data = mux;
clk_mux->lock = lock;
clk_mux->hw.init = &init;
@@ -268,6 +329,7 @@ int mtk_clk_register_muxes(struct device *dev,
struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data)
{
struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct regmap *regmap_hwv;
struct clk_hw *hw;
int i;
@@ -277,6 +339,13 @@ int mtk_clk_register_muxes(struct device *dev,
return PTR_ERR(regmap);
}
+ regmap_hwv = mtk_clk_get_hwv_regmap(node);
+ if (IS_ERR(regmap_hwv)) {
This is either buggy or fragile. mtk_clk_get_hwv_regmap() returns NULL
or valid pointer... or error? IS_ERR_OR_NULL is not the wait to go.
Choose one - IS_ERR or NULL, preferrably the first, since you must
handle deferred probe.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ pr_err("Cannot find hardware voter regmap for %pOF: %pe\n",
+ node, regmap_hwv);
+ return PTR_ERR(regmap_hwv);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
const struct mtk_mux *mux = &muxes[i];
@@ -286,7 +355,7 @@ int mtk_clk_register_muxes(struct device *dev,
continue;
}
- hw = mtk_clk_register_mux(dev, mux, regmap, lock);
+ hw = mtk_clk_register_mux(dev, mux, regmap, regmap_hwv, lock);
So NULL is passed and stored... are you sure this is 100% backwards
compatible?
Best regards,
Krzysztof