Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2025-07-22

Re: [PATCH v2] can: tscan1: CAN_TSCAN1 can depend on PC104

From: Randy Dunlap <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-22 23:57:10
Also in: linux-can


On 7/22/25 5:12 AM, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
On 22/07/2025 at 19:52, Marc Kleine-Budde a écrit :
quoted
On 22.07.2025 12:48:41, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
On 20.07.2025 17:28:23, Randy Dunlap wrote:
quoted
Add a dependency on PC104 to limit (restrict) this driver kconfig
prompt to kernel configs that have PC104 set.

Add COMPILE_TEST as a possibility for more complete build coverage.
I tested this build config on x86_64 5 times without problems.
I've already Vincent's patch [1] on my tree.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250715-can-compile-test-v2-3-f7fd566db86f@wanadoo.fr/ (local)
Don't know how I did not realize the conflict when reviewing :D
quoted
quoted
So this doesn't apply any more. Fixing the merge conflicts result in:

index ba16d7bc09ef..e061e35769bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ config CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM
 
 config CAN_TSCAN1
         tristate "TS-CAN1 PC104 boards"
-        depends on ISA || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_IOPORT)
+        depends on (ISA && PC104) || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_IOPORT)
         help
           This driver is for Technologic Systems' TSCAN-1 PC104 boards.
           https://www.embeddedts.com/products/TS-CAN1
Should be ok?
Looks good. Thanks.
quoted
If no-one complains I'll add this to my can-next tree and remove the
Fixes tag. Otherwise stable will pick this up, but it won't apply
without Vincent's patch.
I do not really mind if those are not backported. No issue for me to drop the
fix tag.
Agreed. Not needed.

-- 
~Randy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help