Re: [RFC v1 00/22] Large rx buffer support for zcrx
From: Mina Almasry <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-28 18:54:25
Also in:
io-uring
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:03 AM Pavel Begunkov [off-list ref] wrote:
This series implements large rx buffer support for io_uring/zcrx on top of Jakub's queue configuration changes, but it can also be used by other memory providers. Large rx buffers can be drastically beneficial with high-end hw-gro enabled cards that can coalesce traffic into larger pages, reducing the number of frags traversing the network stack and resuling in larger contiguous chunks of data for the userspace. Benchamrks showed up to ~30% improvement in CPU util.
Very exciting. I have not yet had a chance to thoroughly look, but even still I have a few high level questions/concerns. Maybe you already have answers to them that can make my life a bit easier as I try to take a thorough look. - I'm a bit confused that you're not making changes to the core net stack to support non-PAGE_SIZE netmems. From a quick glance, it seems that there are potentially a ton of places in the net stack that assume PAGE_SIZE: cd net ackc "PAGE_SIZE|PAGE_SHIFT" | wc -l 468 Are we sure none of these places assuming PAGE_SIZE or PAGE_SHIFT are concerning? - You're not adding a field in the net_iov that tells us how big the net_iov is. It seems to me you're configuring the driver to set the rx buffer size, then assuming all the pp allocations are of that size, then assuming in the rxzc code that all the net_iov are of that size. I think a few problems may happen? (a) what happens if the rx buffer size is re-configured? Does the io_uring rxrc instance get recreated as well? (b) what happens with skb coalescing? skb coalescing is already a bit of a mess. We don't allow coalescing unreadable and readable skbs, but we do allow coalescing devmem and iozcrx skbs which could lead to some bugs I'm guessing already. AFAICT as of this patch series we may allow coalescing of skbs with netmems inside of them of different sizes, but AFAICT so far, the iozcrx assume the size is constant across all the netmems it gets, which I'm not sure is always true? For all these reasons I had assumed that we'd need space in the net_iov that tells us its size: net_iov->size. And then netmem_size(netmem) would replace all the PAGE_SIZE assumptions in the net stack, and then we'd disallow coalescing of skbs with different-sized netmems (else we need to handle them correctly per the netmem_size). -- Thanks, Mina