Re: [PATCH 01/20] bitfield: introduce HWORD_UPDATE bitfield macros
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-06-12 22:01:33
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-clk, linux-media, linux-mmc, linux-pci, linux-phy, linux-pm, linux-rockchip, linux-sound, lkml, llvm
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:10:37 -0400 Yury Norov wrote:
I don't think that that having HWORD_UPDATE() in bitfield.h is a wrong thing. Jakub, if you do, we can just create a new header for it.
Yes, I'd prefer to contain it. This looks very much like a CSR tooling convention of Rockchip's ASIC developers. IOW this is really about how CSRs are access for a specific vendor, not a generic bitfield operator.