Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Allow dyn MSI-X vector allocation of MANA
From: Shradha Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2025-05-29 13:28:45
Also in:
linux-hyperv, linux-pci, linux-rdma, lkml
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 07:55:08PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 08:57:33AM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:quoted
In this patchset we want to enable the MANA driver to be able to allocate MSI-X vectors in PCI dynamically. The first patch exports pci_msix_prepare_desc() in PCI to be able to correctly prepare descriptors for dynamically added MSI-X vectors. The second patch adds the support of dynamic vector allocation in pci-hyperv PCI controller by enabling the MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX_ALLOC_DYN flag and using the pci_msix_prepare_desc() exported in first patch. The third patch adds a detailed description of the irq_setup(), to help understand the function design better. The fourth patch is a preparation patch for mana changes to support dynamic IRQ allocation. It contains changes in irq_setup() to allow skipping first sibling CPU sets, in case certain IRQs are already affinitized to them. The fifth patch has the changes in MANA driver to be able to allocate MSI-X vectors dynamically. If the support does not exist it defaults to older behavior.Hi Shradha, It's unclear what the target tree for this patch-set is. But if it is net-next, which seems likely given the code under drivers/net/, then: Please include that target in the subject of each patch in the patch-set. Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/5] ... And, moreover, ... ## Form letter - net-next-closed The merge window for v6.16 has begun and therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only. Please repost when net-next reopens after June 8th. RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.
Thank you Simon. While posting this patchset I was a bit confused about what should be the target tree. That's why in the cover letter of the V1 for this series, I had requested more clarity on the same (since there are patches from PCI and net-next both). In such cases how do we decide which tree to target? Also, noted about the next merge window for net-next :-) Regards, Shradha.