Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] net: mana: Allocate MSI-X vectors dynamically
From: Shradha Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2025-05-29 13:18:37
Also in:
linux-hyperv, linux-pci, linux-rdma, lkml
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 07:52:35PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 08:59:03AM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:quoted
Currently, the MANA driver allocates MSI-X vectors statically based on MANA_MAX_NUM_QUEUES and num_online_cpus() values and in some cases ends up allocating more vectors than it needs. This is because, by this time we do not have a HW channel and do not know how many IRQs should be allocated. To avoid this, we allocate 1 MSI-X vector during the creation of HWC and after getting the value supported by hardware, dynamically add the remaining MSI-X vectors. Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <redacted> Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>...quoted
+static int mana_gd_setup_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec) +{ + struct gdma_context *gc = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct gdma_irq_context *gic; + int *irqs, *start_irqs, irq; + unsigned int cpu; + int err, i; + + cpus_read_lock(); + + irqs = kmalloc_array(nvec, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!irqs) { err = -ENOMEM; - goto free_irq_array; + goto free_irq_vector; } for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { - gic = &gc->irq_contexts[i]; + gic = kzalloc(sizeof(*gic), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!gic) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto free_irq; + } + gic->handler = mana_gd_process_eq_events; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gic->eq_list); spin_lock_init(&gic->lock);@@ -1418,69 +1498,128 @@ static int mana_gd_setup_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev) snprintf(gic->name, MANA_IRQ_NAME_SZ, "mana_q%d@pci:%s", i - 1, pci_name(pdev)); - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i); - if (irq < 0) { - err = irq; - goto free_irq; + irqs[i] = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i); + if (irqs[i] < 0) { + err = irqs[i]; + goto free_current_gic; } - if (!i) { - err = request_irq(irq, mana_gd_intr, 0, gic->name, gic); - if (err) - goto free_irq; - - /* If number of IRQ is one extra than number of online CPUs, - * then we need to assign IRQ0 (hwc irq) and IRQ1 to - * same CPU. - * Else we will use different CPUs for IRQ0 and IRQ1. - * Also we are using cpumask_local_spread instead of - * cpumask_first for the node, because the node can be - * mem only. - */ - if (start_irq_index) { - cpu = cpumask_local_spread(i, gc->numa_node); - irq_set_affinity_and_hint(irq, cpumask_of(cpu)); - } else { - irqs[start_irq_index] = irq; - } - } else { - irqs[i - start_irq_index] = irq; - err = request_irq(irqs[i - start_irq_index], mana_gd_intr, 0, - gic->name, gic); - if (err) - goto free_irq; - } + err = request_irq(irqs[i], mana_gd_intr, 0, gic->name, gic); + if (err) + goto free_current_gic;Jumping to free_current_gic will free start_irqs. However, start_irqs isn't initialised until a few lines below. Flagged by Smatch.
Thanks Simon, I'll get this in next version
quoted
+ + xa_store(&gc->irq_contexts, i, gic, GFP_KERNEL); } - err = irq_setup(irqs, nvec - start_irq_index, gc->numa_node, false); + /* If number of IRQ is one extra than number of online CPUs, + * then we need to assign IRQ0 (hwc irq) and IRQ1 to + * same CPU. + * Else we will use different CPUs for IRQ0 and IRQ1. + * Also we are using cpumask_local_spread instead of + * cpumask_first for the node, because the node can be + * mem only. + */ + start_irqs = irqs; + if (nvec > num_online_cpus()) { + cpu = cpumask_local_spread(0, gc->numa_node); + irq_set_affinity_and_hint(irqs[0], cpumask_of(cpu)); + irqs++; + nvec -= 1; + } + + err = irq_setup(irqs, nvec, gc->numa_node, false); if (err) goto free_irq; - gc->max_num_msix = nvec; - gc->num_msix_usable = nvec; cpus_read_unlock(); - kfree(irqs); + kfree(start_irqs); return 0; +free_current_gic: + kfree(gic); free_irq: - for (j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--) { - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, j); - gic = &gc->irq_contexts[j]; + for (i -= 1; i >= 0; i--) { + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i); + gic = xa_load(&gc->irq_contexts, i); + if (WARN_ON(!gic)) + continue; irq_update_affinity_hint(irq, NULL); free_irq(irq, gic); + xa_erase(&gc->irq_contexts, i); + kfree(gic); } - kfree(gc->irq_contexts); - gc->irq_contexts = NULL; -free_irq_array: - kfree(irqs); + kfree(start_irqs); free_irq_vector: cpus_read_unlock(); - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev); return err; }...