[PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Convert mlx5 to netdev instance locking · Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> · 2025-05-21
[PATCH net-next 1/5] IB/IPoIB: Enqueue separate work_structs for each flushed interface · Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> · 2025-05-21
[PATCH net-next 2/5] IB/IPoIB: Replace vlan_rwsem with the netdev instance lock · Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> · 2025-05-21
[PATCH net-next 4/5] net/mlx5e: Don't drop RTNL during firmware flash · Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> · 2025-05-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net/mlx5e: Don't drop RTNL during firmware flash · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2025-05-22
[PATCH net-next 3/5] IB/IPoIB: Allow using netdevs that require the instance lock · Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> · 2025-05-21
[PATCH net-next 5/5] net/mlx5e: Convert mlx5 netdevs to instance locking · Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> · 2025-05-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/mlx5e: Convert mlx5 netdevs to instance locking · Stanislav Fomichev <hidden> · 2025-05-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/mlx5e: Convert mlx5 netdevs to instance locking · Cosmin Ratiu <hidden> · 2025-05-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/mlx5e: Convert mlx5 netdevs to instance locking · Stanislav Fomichev <hidden> · 2025-05-22
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Convert mlx5 to netdev instance locking · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2025-05-22
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Convert mlx5 to netdev instance locking · Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> · 2025-05-22
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Convert mlx5 to netdev instance locking · patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org · 2025-05-22

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Convert mlx5 to netdev instance locking

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-05-22 15:51:34
Also in: bpf, linux-rdma, lkml

On Wed, 21 May 2025 15:08:57 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:

This series by Cosmin converts mlx5 to use the recently added netdev
instance locking scheme.

Are you planning to re-submit this as a PR?
The subject tag and Leon's reviews being present makes me think
that applying directly is fine, but I wanted to confirm..

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help