Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] virtio-net: Map NAPIs to queues
From: Joe Damato <hidden>
Date: 2025-02-26 18:08:53
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:03:09PM -0500, Joe Damato wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:48:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:05 AM Joe Damato [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Use netif_queue_set_napi to map NAPIs to queue IDs so that the mapping can be accessed by user apps, taking care to hold RTNL as needed.I may miss something but I wonder whether letting the caller hold the lock is better.Hmm... Double checking all the paths over again, here's what I see: - refill_work, delayed work that needs RTNL so this change seems right? - virtnet_disable_queue_pair, called from virtnet_open and virtnet_close. When called via NDO these are safe and hold RTNL, but they can be called from power management and need RTNL. - virtnet_enable_queue_pair called from virtnet_open, safe when used via NDO but needs RTNL when used via power management. - virtnet_rx_pause called in both paths as you mentioned, one which needs RTNL and one which doesn't.
Sorry, I missed more paths:
- virtnet_rx_resume
- virtnet_tx_pause and virtnet_tx_resume
which are similar to path you mentioned (virtnet_rx_pause) and need
rtnl in one of two different paths.
Let me know if I missed any paths and what your preferred way to fix
this would be?
I think both options below are possible and I have no strong
preference.
I think there are a couple ways to fix this: 1. Edit this patch to remove the virtnet_queue_set_napi helper, and call netif_queue_set_napi from the napi_enable and napi_disable helpers directly. Modify code calling into these paths to hold rtnl (or not) as described above. 2. Modify virtnet_enable_queue_pair, virtnet_disable_queue_pair, and virtnet_rx_pause to take a "bool need_rtnl" as an a function argument and pass that through. I'm not sure which is cleaner and I do not have a preference. Can you let me know which you prefer? I am happy to implement either one for the next revision. [...]quoted
quoted
--- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index e578885c1093..13bb4a563073 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -2807,6 +2807,20 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq) virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq); } +static void virtnet_queue_set_napi(struct net_device *dev, + struct napi_struct *napi, + enum netdev_queue_type q_type, int qidx, + bool need_rtnl) +{ + if (need_rtnl) + rtnl_lock(); + + netif_queue_set_napi(dev, qidx, q_type, napi); + + if (need_rtnl) + rtnl_unlock(); +} + static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi) {@@ -2821,15 +2835,21 @@ static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, local_bh_enable(); } -static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct receive_queue *rq) +static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct receive_queue *rq, bool need_rtnl) { + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv; + int qidx = vq2rxq(rq->vq); + virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi); + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, &rq->napi, + NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, qidx, need_rtnl); } -static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq) +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq, bool need_rtnl) { struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv; struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi; + int qidx = vq2txq(sq->vq); if (!napi->weight) return;@@ -2843,20 +2863,31 @@ static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq) } virtnet_napi_do_enable(sq->vq, napi); + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, napi, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, qidx, + need_rtnl); } -static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct send_queue *sq) +static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct send_queue *sq, bool need_rtnl) { + struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv; struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi; + int qidx = vq2txq(sq->vq); - if (napi->weight) + if (napi->weight) { + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, NULL, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, + qidx, need_rtnl); napi_disable(napi); + } } -static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq) +static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq, bool need_rtnl) { + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv; struct napi_struct *napi = &rq->napi; + int qidx = vq2rxq(rq->vq); + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, NULL, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, qidx, + need_rtnl); napi_disable(napi); }@@ -2870,9 +2901,9 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work) for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) { struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; - virtnet_napi_disable(rq); + virtnet_napi_disable(rq, true); still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL); - virtnet_napi_enable(rq); + virtnet_napi_enable(rq, true); /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in * we will *never* try to fill again.@@ -3069,8 +3100,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) { - virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index]); - virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index]); + virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false); + virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false); xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&vi->rq[qp_index].xdp_rxq); }@@ -3089,8 +3120,8 @@ static int virtnet_enable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) if (err < 0) goto err_xdp_reg_mem_model; - virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index]); - virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index]); + virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false); + virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false); return 0;@@ -3342,7 +3373,7 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq) bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); if (running) { - virtnet_napi_disable(rq); + virtnet_napi_disable(rq, true);During the resize, the rtnl lock has been held on the ethtool path rtnl_lock(); rc = __dev_ethtool(net, ifr, useraddr, ethcmd, state); rtnl_unlock(); virtnet_rx_resize() virtnet_rx_pause() and in the case of XSK binding, I see ASSERT_RTNL in xp_assign_dev() at least.Thanks for catching this. I re-read all the paths and I think I've outlined a few other issues above. Please let me know which of the proposed methods above you'd like me to implement to get this merged. Thanks. --- pw-bot: cr