Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] virtio-net: Map NAPIs to queues
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-02-26 05:49:11
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:05 AM Joe Damato [off-list ref] wrote:
Use netif_queue_set_napi to map NAPIs to queue IDs so that the mapping can be accessed by user apps, taking care to hold RTNL as needed.
I may miss something but I wonder whether letting the caller hold the lock is better. More below.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
$ ethtool -i ens4 | grep driver driver: virtio_net $ sudo ethtool -L ens4 combined 4 $ ./tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py \ --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \ --dump queue-get --json='{"ifindex": 2}' [{'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8289, 'type': 'rx'}, {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8290, 'type': 'rx'}, {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8291, 'type': 'rx'}, {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8292, 'type': 'rx'}, {'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'}, {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'}, {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'}, {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'}] Note that virtio_net has TX-only NAPIs which do not have NAPI IDs, so the lack of 'napi-id' in the above output is expected. Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <redacted> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index e578885c1093..13bb4a563073 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -2807,6 +2807,20 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq) virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq); } +static void virtnet_queue_set_napi(struct net_device *dev, + struct napi_struct *napi, + enum netdev_queue_type q_type, int qidx, + bool need_rtnl) +{ + if (need_rtnl) + rtnl_lock(); + + netif_queue_set_napi(dev, qidx, q_type, napi); + + if (need_rtnl) + rtnl_unlock(); +} + static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi) {@@ -2821,15 +2835,21 @@ static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, local_bh_enable(); } -static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct receive_queue *rq) +static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct receive_queue *rq, bool need_rtnl) { + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv; + int qidx = vq2rxq(rq->vq); + virtnet_napi_do_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi); + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, &rq->napi, + NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, qidx, need_rtnl); } -static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq) +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq, bool need_rtnl) { struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv; struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi; + int qidx = vq2txq(sq->vq); if (!napi->weight) return;@@ -2843,20 +2863,31 @@ static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct send_queue *sq) } virtnet_napi_do_enable(sq->vq, napi); + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, napi, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, qidx, + need_rtnl); } -static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct send_queue *sq) +static void virtnet_napi_tx_disable(struct send_queue *sq, bool need_rtnl) { + struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv; struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi; + int qidx = vq2txq(sq->vq); - if (napi->weight) + if (napi->weight) { + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, NULL, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, + qidx, need_rtnl); napi_disable(napi); + } } -static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq) +static void virtnet_napi_disable(struct receive_queue *rq, bool need_rtnl) { + struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv; struct napi_struct *napi = &rq->napi; + int qidx = vq2rxq(rq->vq); + virtnet_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, NULL, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, qidx, + need_rtnl); napi_disable(napi); }@@ -2870,9 +2901,9 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work) for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) { struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; - virtnet_napi_disable(rq); + virtnet_napi_disable(rq, true); still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL); - virtnet_napi_enable(rq); + virtnet_napi_enable(rq, true); /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in * we will *never* try to fill again.@@ -3069,8 +3100,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) { - virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index]); - virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index]); + virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false); + virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false); xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&vi->rq[qp_index].xdp_rxq); }@@ -3089,8 +3120,8 @@ static int virtnet_enable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) if (err < 0) goto err_xdp_reg_mem_model; - virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index]); - virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index]); + virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false); + virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false); return 0;@@ -3342,7 +3373,7 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq) bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); if (running) { - virtnet_napi_disable(rq); + virtnet_napi_disable(rq, true);
During the resize, the rtnl lock has been held on the ethtool path
rtnl_lock();
rc = __dev_ethtool(net, ifr, useraddr, ethcmd, state);
rtnl_unlock();
virtnet_rx_resize()
virtnet_rx_pause()
and in the case of XSK binding, I see ASSERT_RTNL in xp_assign_dev() at least.
Thanks