Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 2 authors, 2025-02-26

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 09/13] net: phy: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup for fixed-link configuration

From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2025-02-26 14:02:09
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

Please use a subject line of "net: phylink: " for phylink patches, not
"net: phy: " which is for phylib.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:09:24AM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
When phylink creates a fixed-link configuration, it finds a matching
linkmode to set as the advertised, lp_advertising and supported modes
based on the speed and duplex of the fixed link.

Use the newly introduced phy_caps_lookup to get these modes instead of
phy_lookup_settings(). This has the side effect that the matched
settings and configured linkmodes may now contain several linkmodes (the
intersection of supported linkmodes from the phylink settings and the
linkmodes that match speed/duplex) instead of the one from
phy_lookup_settings().

Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
---
V1 -> V2: - fixed pl->link_config.lp_advertising setting

 drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
index 6c67d5c9b787..63fbf3d8708a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
@@ -805,9 +805,10 @@ static int phylink_validate(struct phylink *pl, unsigned long *supported,
 static int phylink_parse_fixedlink(struct phylink *pl,
 				   const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 {
+	__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(match) = { 0, };
 	__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(mask) = { 0, };
+	const struct link_capabilities *c;
 	struct fwnode_handle *fixed_node;
-	const struct phy_setting *s;
 	struct gpio_desc *desc;
 	u32 speed;
 	int ret;
@@ -879,8 +880,10 @@ static int phylink_parse_fixedlink(struct phylink *pl,
 	linkmode_copy(pl->link_config.advertising, pl->supported);
 	phylink_validate(pl, pl->supported, &pl->link_config);
 
-	s = phy_lookup_setting(pl->link_config.speed, pl->link_config.duplex,
-			       pl->supported, true);
+	c = phy_caps_lookup(pl->link_config.speed, pl->link_config.duplex,
+			    pl->supported, true);
+	if (c)
+		linkmode_and(match, pl->supported, c->linkmodes);
What's this for? Surely phy_caps_lookup() should not return a link mode
that wasn't in phy_caps_lookup()'s 3rd argument.

Otherwise...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Pause_BIT, mask);
 	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT, mask);
@@ -889,9 +892,10 @@ static int phylink_parse_fixedlink(struct phylink *pl,
 
 	phylink_set(pl->supported, MII);
 
-	if (s) {
-		__set_bit(s->bit, pl->supported);
-		__set_bit(s->bit, pl->link_config.lp_advertising);
+	if (c) {
+		linkmode_or(pl->supported, pl->supported, match);
+		linkmode_or(pl->link_config.lp_advertising,
+			    pl->link_config.lp_advertising, match);
 	} else {
 		phylink_warn(pl, "fixed link %s duplex %dMbps not recognised\n",
 			     pl->link_config.duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "full" : "half",
@@ -1879,21 +1883,21 @@ static int phylink_register_sfp(struct phylink *pl,
 int phylink_set_fixed_link(struct phylink *pl,
 			   const struct phylink_link_state *state)
 {
-	const struct phy_setting *s;
+	const struct link_capabilities *c;
 	unsigned long *adv;
 
 	if (pl->cfg_link_an_mode != MLO_AN_PHY || !state ||
 	    !test_bit(PHYLINK_DISABLE_STOPPED, &pl->phylink_disable_state))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	s = phy_lookup_setting(state->speed, state->duplex,
-			       pl->supported, true);
-	if (!s)
+	c = phy_caps_lookup(state->speed, state->duplex,
+			    pl->supported, true);
+	if (!c)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	adv = pl->link_config.advertising;
 	linkmode_zero(adv);
-	linkmode_set_bit(s->bit, adv);
+	linkmode_and(adv, pl->supported, c->linkmodes);
... this is wrong since this is basically doing the same as the above
parsing.

I'm not sure why you're generating different code for what is
essentially the same thing.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help