On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:31:21PM -0500, Adam Young wrote:

On 2/6/25 19:30, Jeremy Kerr wrote:

quoted

Hi Adam,

quoted

Is that your only concern with this patch?

Yes, hence the ack. If there are other changes that you end up doing in
response to other reviews, then please address the spacing thing too,
but that certainly doesn't warrant a new revision on its own.

quoted

What else would need to happen in order for this to get ACKed at this
point?

It already has an ack from me.

As for actual merging: If the netdev maintainers have further reviews,
please address those. If not, I assume they would merge in this window.

Should I resubmit this patch with a title that includes net-next in order
for it to be picked up?  I can see that there is stuff being pulled in and
net-next for 6.14 is at RC2.

I am not a maintainer and I don't speak for them, but I've been
following this submission so my guess would be:
  - Fix the spacing issue Jeremy pointed out
  - Include Jeremy's ack in the updated patch
  - Submit a v18 with net-next in the subject line, an indicate in
    the cover letter the two changes you've made (spacing issue and
    adding Jeremy's ack).