Hello,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:00:37PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:22:45 +0100 Thorsten Scherer wrote:
quoted
- regmap_reg_range(0x1122, 0x1127),
- regmap_reg_range(0x112a, 0x112b),
- regmap_reg_range(0x1136, 0x1139),
- regmap_reg_range(0x113e, 0x113f),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x1120, 0x112b),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x1134, 0x113b),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x113c, 0x113f),
can these two not be merged?
I am not 100% sure. But atm I don't see a reason why they could not.
quoted
regmap_reg_range(0x1400, 0x1401),
regmap_reg_range(0x1403, 0x1403),
regmap_reg_range(0x1410, 0x1417),
@@ -747,10 +746,9 @@ static const struct regmap_range ksz8563_valid_regs[] = {
regmap_reg_range(0x2030, 0x2030),
regmap_reg_range(0x2100, 0x2111),
regmap_reg_range(0x211a, 0x211d),
- regmap_reg_range(0x2122, 0x2127),
- regmap_reg_range(0x212a, 0x212b),
- regmap_reg_range(0x2136, 0x2139),
- regmap_reg_range(0x213e, 0x213f),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x2120, 0x212b),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x2134, 0x213b),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x213c, 0x213f),
and these?
Dito.
Will send a v2 as soon as I can get my hands on the test board again
(next few days).
--
pw-bot: cr
Best regards
Thorsten