[ I tried to send this email yesterday but apparently gmail blocked
it for security reasons? So weird. - dan ]
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
From: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:18:39 +0300
quoted
The "sizeof(struct cmsg_bpf_event) + pkt_size + data_size" math could
potentially have an integer wrapping bug on 32bit systems. Check for
Not in practice I suppose? Do we need to fix "never" bugs?
No, this is from static analysis. We don't need to fix never bugs.
This is called from nfp_bpf_ctrl_msg_rx() and nfp_bpf_ctrl_msg_rx_raw()
and I assumed that since pkt_size and data_size come from skb->data on
the rx path then they couldn't be trusted.
Where is the bounds checking?
regards,
dan carpenter