On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:27:36 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote:
quoted
Is there a reason this is defined in ethtool.h?
I moved in to ethtool because the PSE drivers does not need it anymore.
I can keep it in pse.h.
quoted
I have a weak preference towards keeping it in pse-pd/pse.h
since touching ethtool.h rebuilds bulk of networking code.
From that perspective it's also suboptimal that pse-pd/pse.h
pulls in ethtool.h.
Do you prefer the other way around, ethtool.h pulls in pse.h?
No, no, I'd say the order of deceasing preference is:
- headers are independent
- smaller header includes bigger one
- bigger one includes smaller one
Several structure are used in ethtool, PSE core and even drivers at the same
time so I don't have much choice. Or, is it preferable to add a new header?
From a quick look it seemed like pse.h definitely needs the enums from
the uAPI. But I couldn't find anything from the kernel side ethtool.h
header it'd actually require (struct ethtool_c33_pse_ext_state_info
can be moved to pse.h as well?).
Anyways, it's not a major issue for existing code, more of forward guidance.