Re: Re: [syzbot] [mptcp?] general protection fault in proc_scheduler
From: Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-01-06 13:32:56
Also in:
lkml, mptcp
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 08:11:52PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
Hi Eric, (+cc Joel) Thank you for your reply! On 04/01/2025 19:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 7:38 PM Matthieu Baerts [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Eric, Thank you for the bug report! On 02/01/2025 16:21, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 3:12 PM syzbot [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: ccb98ccef0e5 Merge tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v6.13-4' of g.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=128f6ac4580000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=86dd15278dbfe19f dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e364f774c6f57f2c86d1 compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1245eaf8580000 Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d24eb225cff7/disk-ccb98cce.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dd81532f8240/vmlinux-ccb98cce.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/18b08e4bbf40/bzImage-ccb98cce.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+e364f774c6f57f2c86d1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000005: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5924 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00004-gccb98ccef0e5 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 RIP: 0010:proc_scheduler+0xc6/0x3c0 net/mptcp/ctrl.c:125 Code: 03 42 80 3c 38 00 0f 85 fe 02 00 00 4d 8b a4 24 08 09 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 49 8d 7c 24 28 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 cc 02 00 00 4d 8b 7c 24 28 48 8d 84 24 c8 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900034774e8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff9200068ee9e RCX: ffffc90003477620 RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: ffffffff8b08f91e RDI: 0000000000000028 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffc90003477710 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000040 R11: 00000000726f7475 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc90003477620 R14: ffffc90003477710 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fee3cd452d8 CR3: 000000007d116000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> proc_sys_call_handler+0x403/0x5d0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:601 __kernel_write_iter+0x318/0xa80 fs/read_write.c:612 __kernel_write+0xf6/0x140 fs/read_write.c:632 do_acct_process+0xcb0/0x14a0 kernel/acct.c:539 acct_pin_kill+0x2d/0x100 kernel/acct.c:192 pin_kill+0x194/0x7c0 fs/fs_pin.c:44 mnt_pin_kill+0x61/0x1e0 fs/fs_pin.c:81 cleanup_mnt+0x3ac/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1366 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:239 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:43 [inline] do_exit+0xad8/0x2d70 kernel/exit.c:938 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1087 get_signal+0x2576/0x2610 kernel/signal.c:3017 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fee3cb87a6a Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fee3cb87a40. RSP: 002b:00007fffcccac688 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000037 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fffcccac710 RCX: 00007fee3cb87a6a RDX: 0000000000000041 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 00007fffcccac6ac R09: 00007fffcccacac7 R10: 00007fffcccac710 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fee3cd49500 R13: 00007fffcccac6ac R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fee3cd4b000 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:proc_scheduler+0xc6/0x3c0 net/mptcp/ctrl.c:125 Code: 03 42 80 3c 38 00 0f 85 fe 02 00 00 4d 8b a4 24 08 09 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 49 8d 7c 24 28 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 cc 02 00 00 4d 8b 7c 24 28 48 8d 84 24 c8 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900034774e8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff9200068ee9e RCX: ffffc90003477620 RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: ffffffff8b08f91e RDI: 0000000000000028 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffc90003477710 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000040 R11: 00000000726f7475 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc90003477620 R14: ffffc90003477710 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fee3cd452d8 CR3: 000000007d116000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 ---------------- Code disassembly (best guess), 1 bytes skipped: 0: 42 80 3c 38 00 cmpb $0x0,(%rax,%r15,1) 5: 0f 85 fe 02 00 00 jne 0x309 b: 4d 8b a4 24 08 09 00 mov 0x908(%r12),%r12 12: 00 13: 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0xdffffc0000000000,%rax 1a: fc ff df 1d: 49 8d 7c 24 28 lea 0x28(%r12),%rdi 22: 48 89 fa mov %rdi,%rdx 25: 48 c1 ea 03 shr $0x3,%rdx * 29: 80 3c 02 00 cmpb $0x0,(%rdx,%rax,1) <-- trapping instruction 2d: 0f 85 cc 02 00 00 jne 0x2ff 33: 4d 8b 7c 24 28 mov 0x28(%r12),%r15 38: 48 rex.W 39: 8d .byte 0x8d 3a: 84 24 c8 test %ah,(%rax,%rcx,8)(...)quoted
I thought acct(2) was only allowing regular files. acct_on() indeed has : if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode)) { kfree(acct); filp_close(file, NULL); return -EACCES; } It seems there are other ways to call do_acct_process() targeting a sysfs file ?
If this is the case, can you point me to the place where this happens?
quoted
quoted
Just to be sure I'm not misunderstanding your comment: do you mean that here, the issue is *not* in MPTCP code where we get the 'struct net' pointer via 'current->nsproxy->net_ns', but in the FS part, right? Here, we have an issue because 'current->nsproxy' is NULL, but is it normal? Or should we simply exit with an error if it is the case because we are in an exiting phase? I'm just a bit confused, because it looks like 'net' is retrieved from different places elsewhere when dealing with sysfs: some get it from 'current' like us, some assign 'net' to 'table->extra2', others get it from 'table->data' (via a container_of()), etc. Maybe we should not use 'current->nsproxy->net_ns' here then?I do think this is a bug in process accounting, not in networking. It might make sense to output a record on a regular file, but probably not on any other files.
It for sure does not make sense to output a record on a sysctl file that has a maxlen of just 3*sizeof(int) (kernel/acct.c:79).
quoted
diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c index 179848ad33e978a557ce695a0d6020aa169177c6..a211305cb930f6860d02de7f45ebd260ae03a604100644--- a/kernel/acct.c +++ b/kernel/acct.c@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@ static void do_acct_process(struct bsd_acct_struct *acct) const struct cred *orig_cred; struct file *file = acct->file; + if (S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode)) + return; +
This seems like it does not handle the actual culprit which is. Why is the sysctl file being used for the accounting.
quoted
/* * Accounting records are not subject to resource limits. */OK, thank you, that's clearer. So this is then more a question for Joel, right? Do you plan to send this patch to him? #syz set subsystems: fs Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
So what is happening is that: 1. The accounting file is set to a non-sysctl file. 2. And when accounting tries to write to this file, you get the behaviour explained in this mail? Please correct me if I have miss-read the situation. Best -- Joel Granados