Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2025-01-02

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/7] net: dsa: no longer call ds->ops->get_mac_eee()

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-12-12 19:44:25

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 02:26:19PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
All implementations of get_mac_eee() now just return zero without doing
anything useful. Remove the call to this method in preparation to
removing the method from each DSA driver.

Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <redacted>
---
 net/dsa/user.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/user.c b/net/dsa/user.c
index 4239083c18bf..fb38543b29db 100644
--- a/net/dsa/user.c
+++ b/net/dsa/user.c
@@ -1250,23 +1250,11 @@ static int dsa_user_get_eee(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_keee *e)
 {
 	struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_user_to_port(dev);
 	struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
-	int ret;
 
 	/* Check whether the switch supports EEE */
 	if (!ds->ops->support_eee || !ds->ops->support_eee(ds, dp->index))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	/* Port's PHY and MAC both need to be EEE capable */
-	if (!dev->phydev)
-		return -ENODEV;
It may well be that removing this test is ok given the later call to
phylink_ethtool_get_eee() which will fail with the same return code,
but this change does not logically pertain to a patch titled
"no longer call ds->ops->get_mac_eee()", and no justification is brought
for it in the commit message (my previous sentence should be sufficient).
Please move this to a separate patch, for traceability purposes.
-
-	if (!ds->ops->get_mac_eee)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-	ret = ds->ops->get_mac_eee(ds, dp->index, e);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	return phylink_ethtool_get_eee(dp->pl, e);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help