On 04/10/2024 11:41, Sakari Ailus wrote:
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() will soon be changed to include a call to
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). This patch switches the current users to
Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See
longer explanation here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
__pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() which will continue to have the
functionality of old pm_runtime_put_autosuspend().
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index 9e1a34e23af2..4549f1960a27 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static void trf7970a_switch_rf_off(struct trf7970a *trf)
trf->state = TRF7970A_ST_RF_OFF;
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(trf->dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(trf->dev);
+ __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(trf->dev);
But why? Nothing in commit msg explains why you cannot use the new API here.
Best regards,
Krzysztof