From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:31:29 -0700
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:19:24 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
quoted
quoted
I was simply suggesting to correct the changelog, and make clear we
need a recent enough ethtool.
Yeah I got it, thanks. Will reword.
quoted
We can not simply say that ethtool always supported the modern way
(ETH_SS_FEATURES)
I didn't work with Linux at all back in 2011, so I didn't even know
there were older ways of handling this :D Always something to learn, nice.
Are we removing the bit definitions just for code cleanliness?
Uhm, no, to free more bits to be able to add new features.
On one hand it may be good to make any potential breakage obvious,
on the other we could avoid regressions if we stick to reserving
the bits, and reusing them, but the bits we don't delete could remain
at their current position?
Hmm, sounds fine. IOW just rename all the bits I remove to
__UNUSED_NETIF_F_xx?
Thanks,
Olek