Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] netdev_features: remove unused __UNUSED_NETIF_F_1
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2024-08-22 16:12:32
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 5:24 PM Alexander Lobakin [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 17:43:16 +0200quoted
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 5:07 PM Alexander Lobakin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
NETIF_F_NO_CSUM was removed in 3.2-rc2 by commit 34324dc2bf27 ("net: remove NETIF_F_NO_CSUM feature bit") and became __UNUSED_NETIF_F_1. It's not used anywhere in the code. Remove this bit waste. It wasn't needed to rename the flag instead of removing it as netdev features are not uAPI/ABI. Ethtool passes their names and values separately with no fixed positions and the userspace Ethtool code doesn't have any hardcoded feature names/bits, so that new Ethtool will work on older kernels and vice versa.This is only true for recent enough ethtool (>= 3.4) You might refine the changelog to not claim this "was not needed". Back in 2011 (and linux-2.6.39) , this was needed for sure. I am not sure we have a documented requirement about ethtool versions.But how then Ethtool < 3.4 works with the latest kernels? I believe we already moved some bits and/or removed some features or it's not true?
Presumably most of the 'old and useful' bits are at the same location, or ethtool has been updated by distros.
I could try building it, not sure it would build though. How do you think then we should approach this? Maybe document the requirement? I don't think we should leave the features as they are and sit with no bits available only to support ancient Ethtool versions.
I was simply suggesting to correct the changelog, and make clear we need a recent enough ethtool. We can not simply say that ethtool always supported the modern way (ETH_SS_FEATURES)