Hello Eric,

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 5:41 PM Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 4:55 PM Jason Xing [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

Introducing a new type TCP_STATE to handle some reset conditions
appearing in RFC 793 due to its socket state. Actually, we can look
into RFC 9293 which has no discrepancy about this part.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

I really think this SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE is weak.

'Please see RFC 9293' does not help, this RFC has more than 5000 lines in it :/

Yes, there are various reasons and conditions written in RFC 9293
nearly all over the place. I'm unable to conclude and get an union
name. Sorry about that. If I figure out a better name in the future,
I'll let you know.

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Thanks for all your help.

Thanks,
Jason