On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 4:55 PM Jason Xing [off-list ref] wrote:

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

Introducing a new type TCP_STATE to handle some reset conditions
appearing in RFC 793 due to its socket state. Actually, we can look
into RFC 9293 which has no discrepancy about this part.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

I really think this SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE is weak.

'Please see RFC 9293' does not help, this RFC has more than 5000 lines in it :/

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>