Re: [PATCH vhost v13 04/12] virtio_ring: support add premapped buf
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date: 2024-06-04 16:18:24
Also in:
bpf, virtualization
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 6:07 PM Ilya Leoshkevich [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 20:30 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:quoted
If the vq is the premapped mode, use the sg_dma_address() directly. Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.cb/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index 8e81b01e0735..f9f772e85a38 100644--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c@@ -361,6 +361,11 @@ static struct device *vring_dma_dev(const structvring_virtqueue *vq) static int vring_map_one_sg(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq, struct scatterlist *sg, enum dma_data_direction direction, dma_addr_t *addr) { + if (vq->premapped) { + *addr = sg_dma_address(sg); + return 0; + } +I wonder if something needs to be done for KMSAN here, like it's done by the next block in this function? I'm looking into what seems to be a KMSAN false positive on s390x: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in receive_buf+0x45ca/0x6990 receive_buf+0x45ca/0x6990 virtnet_poll+0x17e0/0x3130 net_rx_action+0x832/0x26e0 handle_softirqs+0x330/0x10f0 [...]
I think there's a similar problem on x86 as well: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c5336dcd1b741349d27a I was going to look closer this week.