RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [net-next PATCH v5 02/10] octeontx2-pf: RVU representor driver
From: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@marvell.com>
Date: 2024-06-25 11:58:41
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Markus Elfring <redacted> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2024 8:42 PM To: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@marvell.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; David S. Miller [off-list ref]; Eric Dumazet [off-list ref]; Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]; Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] Cc: LKML <redacted>; Hariprasad Kelam [off-list ref]; Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta [off-list ref]; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham [off-list ref] Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [net-next PATCH v5 02/10] octeontx2-pf: RVU representor driverquoted
This patch adds basic driver for the RVU representor.… Please improve such a change description with imperative wordings. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__git.kernel.org_pub_scm_linux_kernel_git_torvalds_linux.git_tree_Docum entation_process_submitting-2Dpatches.rst-3Fh-3Dv6.10-2Drc3- 23n94&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=UiEt_nUeYFctu7JVLXVlXD hTmq_EAfooaZEYInfGuEQ&m=xQWm4c1xZmKhlrocmDCG4wCtdou3imYNqOq6 gc0ztVLS_xorfok2yNlJvGz1VZ3H&s=QjFN8k0CouBpoGyBrk6eVoIUE7ehlCaJDSKT nIOvGew&e= Can an adjusted summary phrase become also a bit more helpful? https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__elixir.bootlin.com_linux_v6.10- 2Drc3_source_Documentation_process_maintainer-2Dtip.rst- 23L124&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=UiEt_nUeYFctu7JVLXVlXD hTmq_EAfooaZEYInfGuEQ&m=xQWm4c1xZmKhlrocmDCG4wCtdou3imYNqOq6 gc0ztVLS_xorfok2yNlJvGz1VZ3H&s=3pyeUiahw8W4NW4bo4IE785fCId1HnoZcd havPlF2ZI&e= …quoted
+static int rvu_get_rep_cnt(struct otx2_nic *priv) {…quoted
+ mutex_lock(&priv->mbox.lock); + req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_get_rep_cnt(&priv->mbox);…quoted
+exit: + mutex_unlock(&priv->mbox.lock); + return err; +}… Would you become interested to apply a statement like “guard(mutex)(&priv-quoted
mbox.lock);”?https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__elixir.bootlin.com_linux_v6.10-2Drc3_source_include_linux_mutex.h- 23L196&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=UiEt_nUeYFctu7JVLXVlXD hTmq_EAfooaZEYInfGuEQ&m=xQWm4c1xZmKhlrocmDCG4wCtdou3imYNqOq6 gc0ztVLS_xorfok2yNlJvGz1VZ3H&s=_FctAWQQczGBL2JWu_iLo4v5650355w6Xd MjpvJbhjk&e=
Thanks for your suggestions. Will submit separate patch for entire driver.
…quoted
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/rep.h@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@…quoted
+#ifndef REP_H +#define REP_H… Can unique include guards be more desirable also for this software? Regards, Markus