Hi Andrew,

On 31/05/24 6:07 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote:

EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

quoted

So I would request all of you to give your comments on the existing
implementation in the patch series to improve better. Once this version
is mainlined we will discuss further to implement further features
supported. I feel the current discussion doesn't have any impact on the
existing implementation which supports basic 10Base-T1S Ethernet
communication.

Agreed. Lets focus on what we have now.

Great. Thanks for your opinion on this.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240418125648.372526-2-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com/

Version 4 failed to apply. So we are missing all the CI tests. We need
a v5 which cleanly applies to net-next in order for those tests to
run.

Sure I will start preparing the v5 now.

I think we should disable vendor interrupts by default, since we
currently have no way to handle them.

OK, I will remove the patch which enables the interrupts.

I had a quick look at the comments on the patches. I don't think we
have any other big issues not agreed on. So please post a v5 with them
all addressed and we will see what the CI says.

Sure, thanks for the confirmation.

Best regards,
Parthiban V

Piergiorgio, if you have any real problems getting basic support for
your device working with this framework, now would be a good time to
raise the problems.

         Andrew