quoted

If I read correctly, allowing each NIC to expose it's own different
starting configuration still will not solve the problem for this H/W to
switch from WRR to SP (and vice versa).

I also suspect this is not unique to this hardware. I've not looked at
other SOHO switches, but it is reasonably common to have different
queues for different priority classes, and then one shaper for the
overall port rate.

quoted

AFAICS, what would be needed there is an atomic set of operations:
'set_many' (and e.v. 'delete_many', 'create_many') that will allow
changing all the shapers at once. 

Yep.

quoted

With such operations, that H/W could still fit the expected 'no-op'
default, as WRR on the queue shapers is what we expect. I agree with
Jakub, handling the complexity of arbitrary starting configuration
would pose a lot of trouble to the user/admin.

If all the above stands together, I think we have a few options (in
random order):

- add both set of operations: the ones operating on a single shaper and
the ones operating on multiple shapers
- use only the multiple shapers ops.

And the latter looks IMHO the simple/better.

I would agree, start with only multiple shaper opps. If we find that
many implementation end up just iterating the list and dealing with
them individually, would could pull that iterator into the core, and
expand the ops to either/or, multiple or single.

quoted

int (*set)(struct net_device *dev, int how_many, const u32 *handles,
	   const struct net_shaper_info *shapers,
           struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int (*reset)(struct net_device *dev, int how_many, const u32 *handles,
             struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int (*move)(struct net_device *dev, int how_many, const u32 *handles,
            const u32 *new_parent_handles,
	    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);

An NIC with 'static' shapers can implement a dummy move always
returning EOPNOTSUPP and eventually filling a detailed extack.

The extack is going to be important here, we are going to need
meaningful error messages.

Overall, i think this can be made to work with the hardware i have.

	 Andrew