Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Introduce uts_release
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Date: 2024-01-31 17:17:14
Also in:
linux-kbuild, linux-trace-kernel, lkml
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Date: 2024-01-31 17:17:14
Also in:
linux-kbuild, linux-trace-kernel, lkml
On 31/01/2024 16:22, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
before: real 0m53.591s user 1m1.842s sys 0m9.161s after: real 0m37.481s user 0m46.461s sys 0m7.199s Sending as an RFC as I need to test more of the conversions and I would like to also convert more UTS_RELEASE users to prove this is proper approach.I like it, I also think that v4l2 includes this as well as all of those drivers seem to rebuild when this changes, does that not happen for you too?
I didn't see that. Were you were building for arm64? I can see some v4l2 configs enabled there for the vanilla defconfig (but none for x86-64).
Anyway, if the firmware changes work, I'm all for this, thanks for taking it on!
cheers. BTW, I just noticed that utsrelase.h might not be updated for my allmodconfig build when I change the head commit - I'll investigate why ... John